Comparing Coach and Player Centred Coaching…<\/b><\/p>\n
As I have already said over the last couple of weeks, if coaches\/teachers\/parents are more aware of the differences between these two approaches\/philosophies then they can be more informed and thus make better decisions about how they wish to teach\/coach and from a parents perspective, have a better understanding of what they should be observing stood on the sidelines whilst watching their child\/children play sport with a coach\/teacher.<\/p>\n
One of these ways is to find some of the research out there and then translate it into coaches\u2019\/teachers\u2019\/parents\u2019 speak that is concise and easier to understand. Quite often research articles are stuck behind paywalls and thus hard to get. They are also written in language that is sometimes difficult to cypher, are rather long and take a good chunk of time to get through and understand.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis molecular view, reflecting the hegemony of biomechanics, helps teachers break down games content into the smallest component parts of technique before introduction to the game; tactical and perceptual aspects of skills are added methodically to the technique (Kirk, 2010). This process might result in movement patterns becoming increasingly abstract and as far removed from the game to render them meaningless.\u201d (p.2)<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This is where the power of Vern Gambetta\u2019s GAIN Professional Network comes to great fruition, as my very good friend Xavier Roy (a GAIN member out in Montreal, Canada), is busy finishing his PhD at University of Sherbrook which means he basically has open access to all the Journals out there. So I send Xavier a message and when he can, he\u2019ll email back the particular article(s) that I am interested in reading.<\/p>\n